No future for boys?
Digital Document
| Content type |
Content type
|
|---|---|
| Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
| Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
| Genre |
Genre
|
| Origin Information |
|
|---|
| Persons |
Author (aut): Allan, Jonathan A.
|
|---|
| Abstract |
Abstract
Crises of masculinity and wars on boys often deploy the suicides of young males as a rhetorical strategy in raising awareness for a political cause, that is to say a declaration of war, a war that remains dubious at best. Who, for instance, declared “war” on “boys”? This paper argues that theorists of gender, particularly masculinity, must think carefully and critically about suicide as a rhetorical strategy. In particular, this paper seeks to explain why men’s rights activists and scholars prefer the term “boys” to “young men” or “adolescents,” and subsequently aims to work through ideas of temporality, futurity, and slow death to understand the deployment of suicide as strategy. |
|---|
| Publication Title |
Publication Title
|
|---|---|
| Publication Number |
Publication Number
Volume 8, Issue 1
|
| DOI |
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3167/bhs.2015.080103
|
|---|
| Note |
|
|---|
| Rights Statement |
Rights Statement
|
|---|
| Keywords |
Keywords
crisis of masculinity
futurity
masculinity
slow death
suicide
temporality
|
|---|